The widely anticipated kickoff of the US Federal Reserve’s rate-cutting cycle caught few investors by surprise in September. But should this inflection point in Fed policy warrant rethinking your fixed income positioning?
At various points in time during the past few years, overly simplistic approaches to fixed income – including both cash-oriented and Agg-oriented (Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index) allocations – have proven adequate. However, the risks and opportunities have clearly shifted, and these simplistic approaches may now limit your ability to accomplish your goals over the next couple of years. So what factors should you look at to determine whether a new approach is needed? There are three key points to consider when answering this question today: avoiding reinvestment risk, limiting concentration risk, and diversifying across multiple macroeconomic paths.
1. Protect against reinvestment risk
Cash returns can change quickly. The Fed’s 50 basis point cut in September was a great reminder of this. Looking out at expectations for the Fed funds rate over the next few years offers a good sense of the market’s expected path of cash. The 5.0%+ return days appear to be over. Cash expectations over the next two years are just 3.9%, and over five years, just 3.4%.1 Investors with time horizons greater than a year or two should take special note of this.
It may feel like a lot of cuts are already priced in, and the market may have gotten ahead of itself. But historically, cutting cycles have been sudden and steep around recessions and a bit more measured during midcycle adjustments. Without knowing for certain which type of environment we’re heading in to, the market has anticipated somewhat of an average between the two. Having too high of a cash allocation at the start of a cutting cycle creates reinvestment risk. Staying in cash as rates are falling means missing an opportunity to lock in higher returns over multiple years.
2. Avoid Agg concentration
At the other end of the spectrum, the Agg investor is protected from reinvestment risk but is exposed to drawdowns from more concentrated bets. This index comprises only half of the US fixed income universe, meaning you are missing out on diversifying exposures in other fixed income segments. Investing in the Agg is making three highly correlated bets on the US Treasury bond market, agency mortgage-backed securities, and US corporate bonds. Moreover, the proportion of US Treasuries has steadily increased over the past several years, increasingly making the Agg a play on Treasury yields.
Bloomberg US Aggregate, Treasury Allocation
A more robust fixed income sleeve with greater differentiation from the Agg can provide more opportunities for both return enhancement and risk mitigation. If the goal is to maximize risk-adjusted returns, you want more levers in your portfolio that can be used for either return enhancement or risk mitigation. This includes plus sectors like broader securitized categories, high yield, bank loans, and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs). It can also include more defensive exposures like floating rate securities, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), and certain currencies.
3. Diversify to outperform in different types of environments
For duration-sensitive strategies, the path to outperform broader fixed income via price appreciation from falling yields has narrowed. But the starting point was particularly attractive, and the case for duration has gone from great to good. Still, overly relying on outperformance from falling yields may be too limited of an approach. Thinking about the directional possibilities of Treasury rates and credit spreads, the Agg investor is positioned to outperform only in lower-rate environments. Meanwhile, the cash investor is positioned to outperform broader fixed income only in higher-rates and spread-widening scenarios.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do you still do well in range-bound yield environments? How do you add value in tight spread environments that might stay tight for a while?
Solution: Broaden your opportunity set
Hold the short end of the yield curve for lower volatility and better risk-adjusted returns. Hold the intermediate/long end for equity-risk offset. And hold both for both.
A core-satellite approach with a core-plus core and a lower duration, more flexible satellite (such as nontraditional or multi-sector bond) gives you a “core plus plus” profile that can more effectively target outperformance in different scenarios. The combined exposure from this type of construct diversifies exposure across the yield curve. It also provides more levers for active management, avoiding the benchmark-aware approach that has become a concentrated bet on rates falling. It allows you to be more selective with credit selection in a tight spread environment and helps to avoid needing dedicated strategies for several niche fixed income categories that can create line-item risk and make the portfolio more difficult to manage.
Overall, the core piece gives you enough of the high-quality duration poised to outperform in a growth scare and in a midcycle policy recalibration. The satellite’s lower duration and slightly higher credit quality vs. high yield and many multisector strategies may benefit relative performance in a range-bound or slightly higher interest rate environment – particularly in one where spreads drift modestly higher. Finally, the additional flexibility that you’ve attained can add value across fixed income segments, regardless of the cycle.
Investment ideas
1 Source: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 10/17/2024
This material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. The views and opinions contained herein reflect the subjective judgments and assumptions of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the views of Natixis Investment Managers or any of its affiliates. The views and opinions are as of October 21, 2024, and may change based on market and other conditions. There can be no assurance that developments will transpire as forecasted, and actual results may vary.
All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss. The views and opinions expressed may change based on market and other conditions. They are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. There can be no assurance that developments will transpire as forecasted. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Unlike passive investments, there are no indexes that an active investment attempts to track or replicate. Thus, the ability of an active investment to achieve its objectives will depend on the effectiveness of the investment manager.
Fixed income securities may carry one or more of the following risks: credit, interest rate (as interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall), inflation and liquidity.
Credit risk is the risk that the issuer of a fixed-income security may fail to make timely payments of interest or principal or to otherwise honor its obligations.
Duration risk measures a bond's price sensitivity to interest rate changes. Bond funds and individual bonds with a longer duration (a measure of the expected life of a security) tend to be more sensitive to changes in interest rates, usually making them more volatile than securities with shorter durations.
Interest rate risk is a major risk to all bondholders. As rates rise, existing bonds that offer a lower rate of return decline in value because newly issued bonds that pay higher rates are more attractive to investors.
High yield bonds are rated below BBB/Baa. Ratings are determined by third-party rating agencies such as Standard & Poor's or Moody's and are an indication of a bond's credit quality.
Plus sectors refer to additional fixed income sectors some strategies invest in, such as high yield bonds, emerging market bonds, floating rate bank loans, and non-US dollar bonds, to seek greater diversification or yield potential.
The yield spread is the difference in the expected rate of return between two investments.
Unlike passive investments, there are no indexes that an active investment attempts to track or replicate. Thus, the ability of an active investment to achieve its objectives will depend on the effectiveness of the investment manager.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by the CFA Institute.
This material may not be redistributed, published, or reproduced, in whole or in part. Although Natixis Investment Managers believes the information provided in this material to be reliable, including that from third-party sources, it does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.
This document may contain references to copyrights, indexes and trademarks that may not be registered in all jurisdictions. Third-party registrations are the property of their respective owners and are not affiliated with Natixis Investment Managers or any of its related or affiliated companies (collectively “Natixis”). Such third-party owners do not sponsor, endorse or participate in the provision of any Natixis services, funds or other financial products.
Provided by Natixis Distribution, LLC, 888 Boylston St., Boston, MA 02199. Natixis Investment Managers includes all of the investment management and distribution entities affiliated with Natixis Distribution, LLC and Natixis Investment Managers S.A. Natixis Advisors, LLC provides advisory services through its division Natixis Investment Managers Solutions. Advisory services are generally provided with the assistance of model portfolio providers, some of which are affiliates of Natixis Investment Managers, LLC.