At a very high level, we think the AI fears are overly generalized in many instances.
The competitive advantage of many software companies was never that they were the most efficient or the cheapest developer of software or code. It's that they have lock-in with their customers. It's that they're integrated with a number of other applications and systems. It's that they house all the data, that they're the system of record, that they're reliable, that they're safe. And all of that comes with high switching costs and pricing power. Our software companies expect to be AI beneficiaries, not victims here. And they're going to adopt a lot of these same tools and integrate them and deliver them to their clients.
But maybe stepping back, wading into controversy after sharp declines in the market is nothing new for us. In just the past six years, we've had to contend with COVID, the ensuing growth stock massacre in 2022, the regional banking crisis in '23, the tariff tantrum in '25, and now the saaspocalypse in '26. And in each instance, we've attempted to capitalize on businesses that we thought were being kind of indiscriminately sold off, as the market tends to paint with a broad brush.
The dispersion that we saw wasn't limited to the Russell. I think if you zoom out more, the performance dispersion was extreme in the S&P, as well. The 50th best stock in the S&P 500 outperformed the 450th by some 45 percentage points this quarter. That's that P90 through P10 spread that we're showing. And that divergence is about as wide as we've seen since the COVID shutdown.
Now, to us, that wide dispersion spells opportunity. The broader market moves were somewhat muted, but the divergence under the hood was pretty significant. And when it gets this wide, it allows us to rotate out of names that are near our sell target and to reinvest into more attractive opportunities that are trading at deeper discounts to our estimate of intrinsic value.