Information on Fraud Attempts

We would like to draw your attention to the fact that Natixis Investment Managers Australia Pty Limited and its affiliated companies, like all firms, are regularly targeted by malicious individuals through attempts at fraud, various scams, and extortion attempts, particularly through identity theft, the creation of fake email addresses, offers of fake financial products, cryptocurrencies, etc. For more information, please click on this link.

Select your local site for products and services by region

Americas

Asia Pacific

Europe

Location not listed?

Investments
From broad money market exposure to niche private assets our investment managers offer expertise across the investment spectrum.
Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund
Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund
The Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund is a conviction-based and multi-thematic ESG strategy investing in international equities
Echoes
Echoes
History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often echoes. Some echoes fade. Others become signals.
About us
Macro views

Echoes: When the crowd pivots, stay grounded in fundamentals

February 11, 2026 - 9 min
Echoes: When the crowd pivots, stay grounded in fundamentals

Nitin Gupta, Managing Partner at private equity specialists Flexstone Partners, says building wealth is about consistent, understandable growth rather than chasing the next fad, and that patience and adaptability always win out against the next prediction of doom.

 

As we reflect on the past 25 years of investing, is there one market event you see as leaving a lasting legacy?

Nitin Gupta (NG): It's tempting to look for a single defining event, but I've found there isn’t one. My 30-year career – from my start at Merrill Lynch in M&A in 1995 to my long stint in private equity since 1997 – has spanned the Asian currency crisis, the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), the dotcom bust, 9/11, the GFC, the eurozone crisis, Covid, and the subsequent supply chain disruption, inflation and rapid rise in interest rates, along with countless geo-political events and uncertainties.

Every dislocation feels unique at the time, but the only real certainty is the persistence of uncertainty. Sir John Templeton said that the four most dangerous words in investing are ‘This time it’s different’. It’s rarely true because crises differ in their contour, yet human behaviour and market cycles do seem to have remarkable echoes.

Take LTCM in 1998. This supposedly fail-proof hedge fund run by Nobel laureates collapsed spectacularly, requiring government intervention. That was quickly followed by the Asian currency crisis and US political turmoil. Each ‘unprecedented’ event came with calls that private markets would be devastated.

Fast forward, and you see the dotcom collapse in 2000, the Enron scandal, then 9/11 – which, for the US, was a shock of unique scale. And each time, the predictions of doom were everywhere. But patience and adaptability have always won out.

 

What about the Covid shock? Were there any specific lessons to draw from that event?

NG: Covid was astonishing on the human tragedy level first and foremost. But if you’d told me that over one million people in the US alone would die, I’d have expected a much worse outcome for economies. Who could have predicted the US economy would recover as strongly as it did within a year? The bounce-back highlights how resilient markets are.

And the lesson is that if you focus too narrowly on the short term, you’ll miss this pattern of recovery. As investors, we must have a long view – month-to-month or quarter-to-quarter thinking leads you astray, since you never have the same event twice. Each crisis is specific, but recovery is consistent.

 

How difficult is it to navigate the investment landscape knowing the next crisis could come from an unexpected place – or what former options trader and author Nassim Nicholas Taleb called a ‘black swan’ event?

NG: You must accept the reality of unknown unknowns – to that extent, Donald Rumsfeld framed it best. In short, we just don’t know the full range of risks ahead. That’s why a long-term horizon is so critical, particularly in private equity.

Public markets may swing wildly quarter to quarter, but over 10, 15, 20, 25 years, persistent value comes from discipline. The private equity asset class has, in fact, outperformed over long periods. Yearly head-to-heads can be deceiving – sometimes public markets explode higher in a year, but the cumulative growth impact of private equity emerges over the long term.

Indeed, US economic history is a story of long-term resilience; GDP growth is like a ‘hockey stick’, even though there are frequent dips. Periods labelled ‘the death of US exceptionalism’ have been overly exaggerated and proven wrong. But investors get anxious during these dips and crave prediction and reassurance. Often it seems that everyone wants to be the next big crisis-caller – like how Michael Burry is portrayed in ‘The Big Short’ – yet things usually recover for the patient and thoughtful.

 

Does surviving multiple market cycles change your appetite for risk?

NG: Not fundamentally. If you back strong companies led by capable management, you come through tough times. Most failure isn’t from industries shifting overnight, but from weak leadership. In private equity, we insist on working with funds that are hands-on with their portfolio companies, especially those led by teams who’ve managed through multiple crises.

Because experience matters. For instance, after the GFC or Covid, good funds were quick to action – tightening spending, preserving liquidity – that helped solid managers shepherd companies through to recovery. Creating a well-diversified portfolio and investing with experienced funds who know their sectors and markets well and have a strong network of operating partners and executives who can step in to help their portfolio companies is vital. No matter the external shock, hands-on guidance and a strong network make management teams more adaptable and resilient.

 

How important is diversification in private equity?

NG: It’s fundamental, because no one can predict what will outperform or not. Time and again, sector-specific bets have backfired. In 2000, crowding into technology was dangerous – Cisco was seen as invincible. Today, that would be Nvidia. But who knows when markets turn, and a sector or company falls out of favour. That’s why we build highly diversified portfolios by industry and by number of investments, so one misstep doesn’t wreck returns.

The key themes for us are, first, investing in mission-critical companies, especially those that provide high value for low cost. Second, we pursue buy-and-build strategies in fragmented markets, where our platform investment can consolidate smaller firms, extract synergies and average down entry multiples. And third, we back businesses that effectively use technology/digitization for operational improvement and efficiency– we avoid speculative ‘tech for tech’s sake’.

 

Flexstone was founded just before the GFC. Did the magnitude of the crisis change your investment approach?

NG: Being in New York during the GFC, the distress was palpable. Funds had overleveraged companies, and when sales dropped, covenant breaches and distress followed.

Getting the industry call wrong can happen, but backing strong management teams is more critical. Good managers find ways to manage through difficulty – even in sectors under strain. Ideally, you want sponsors with scar tissue – those who have led companies through prior crises. We invest with funds where the principals have seen cycles across decades. It’s impossible to have a zero-loss portfolio, but experience and humility reduce the odds of disaster.

There are always investible sub-sectors, even when the headlines are dire. You must be selective, but not abandon whole categories."

Also, leverage discipline matters. Having watched the disaster of over-leveraging in the GFC, we resist the temptation to maximise debt in the benign years. If generating returns depends on stretching leverage, that’s a sign the deal is wrong.

Instead, we prefer businesses that take on less leverage than available and reserve ample cushion – a company doing four or five times leverage in a six-times market – so there’s room to absorb shocks. We generally avoid companies running at the maximum permissible debt, and our preference is for lower average leverage – even if the market would finance more.

Because overpaying is a costly mistake. Some deals done at high multiples in 2021-2022 now require longer holding period for growth to justify those valuations. Put simply, the danger of getting stuck in a capital structure that becomes unmanageable is simply too high.

 

Does opportunity exist in every crisis?

NG: Yes, there are always opportunities, even within sectors hit hardest by crisis. During 2008, when many froze, we completed three investments – one in healthcare, one in business services, and one in consumer products. All did well, despite the climate; even the consumer business – a ‘no-go zone’ in theory, given collapsing sentiment – produced a solid return. Key lesson: there are always investible sub-sectors, even when the headlines are dire. You must be selective, but not abandon whole categories.

 

Private equity gets criticised for lack of transparency compared to public markets. How do you ensure discipline and oversight?

NG: We run quarterly valuations for investors, ensuring transparency and discipline. As a co-investor and a fund investor, we don’t make control investments in our portfolio companies – so selecting funds is critical. Even good funds must be regularly underwritten – teams change, strategies evolve, fund sizes grow. Success at $500 million fund size doesn’t guarantee replication at $1.5 billion.

We ask: is the core strategy intact? Is the team engaged and hungry? Track records matter, but so does continuous improvement. Every manager should learn from past mistakes to keep loss ratios low and adapt for future challenges.

 

If you were talking to someone starting out in their investment career today, what advice would you given them?

NG: Don’t get swept up in the mania of market cycles or technological buzz. At the height of the dotcom bubble, fundamentals – revenues, EBITDA – were sidelined in favour of hypothetical metrics. Eventually, reality returns and markets revert to earnings and profitable cash flow.

Sticking with the basics is timeless: know the true drivers of the business, understand its financial foundation, and be reassured that profitability and real-world earnings always reassert themselves. The fundamentals are inescapable.

 

You sound very much like a value investor in public markets. Is that an unfair observation?

NG: Markets differ, but lessons are universal. Thirty years in mid-market and industrial deals has taught me this – non-sexy businesses may be boring, but their financials are tangible, their prospects observable. When the crowd moves to extremes, we stay grounded in fundamentals, and we’re comfortable missing out on flashy trades. Building wealth is about consistent, understandable growth, not chasing fads.

 

After Covid, it wasn’t uncommon to go to a dinner party and find a number of people claiming they’d made a fortune in day-trading crypto or meme stocks. How do you respond to those bragging about making generational wealth in just a few investments?

NG: If chasing the next Nvidia or Bitcoin is someone’s passion, our approach won’t suit them. We pursue a ‘sleep well at night’ strategy: aiming for consistent two-times returns, fund after fund. That’s the ethos we built at Flexstone. It’s not about finding a unicorn – it’s about repeatable, sustainable performance. Investors attracted by this steadiness appreciate the value of compounding and repeatable returns.

Everyone loves talking about windfall trades or building generational wealth at cocktail parties, but many experienced allocators recognise the wisdom of steady, consistent results – especially institutional investors. We don’t advocate putting 100% into PE, but believe PE should be a part of most portfolios.

 

Interviewed in November 2025

Echoes

Markets don't repeat, they echo. Echoes from the past, signals for the future. Learn lessons from 25 years of investing.

Echoes

Part of the Echoes series

Interviews and insights by seasoned investment managers from across the Natixis multi-affiliate family.

  • Key investor lessons from 25 years in markets
  • The 2000 dotcom bubble vs today’s AI-driven markets
  • How to avoid being left in freefall when a bubble bursts
  • What the GFC meant for bond markets
  • Why every market is linked to central bank decisions
  • Are we in a new paradigm for fixed income?
  • Why Covid broke the pattern

Marketing communication. This material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Views expressed in this article as of the date indicated are subject to change and there can be no assurance that developments will transpire as may be forecasted in this article. All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk in all market environments. Investment risk exists with equity, fixed income, and alternative investments. There is no assurance that any investment will meet its performance objectives or that losses will be avoided. The reference to specific securities, sectors, or markets within this material does not constitute investment advice.

DR-76347